I still have my XBox 360, although I don't use it much now and never felt the urge to move on to further generations due to seeing too many sequels and remasters. Then it's just a matter of triggering it "Ding! Hey, you found it!".Īnd that's why I can't make myself play anything on the switch, which can be played on PlayStation. This kind of game already MUST have the events (hidden, difficult, variable or standard). It's great marketing for Sony/Microsoft keeping your lifelong collection AND a great opportunity for devs to show wit. It's not about being rewarded, but rewarding the devs by experiencing all their quests and Easter eggs, lore, challenge. You do everything there is to be done in a game to get that sense of completion and move on to another title. You get ALL trophies for the games you love. Trophies are a collection of gaming memories unified on a single platform. Nintendo doesn't have them cause "playing the game should be its own reward". They aren't digital pats on the back for wasting hours on something pointless.
I think trophies/achievements are largely misunderstood. I would make an exception for a good JA game and maybe sit on my aging PC, but if there is a console version I would 100% prefer it. I want to play all of the above on console. It should be great on consoles, although interface (especially inventory) might suffer a bit. I want to see how Anno 1800 (announced on consoles) will handle the added complexity of being real time. Some are quite buggy or bad (Commandos 2, I hear is one example), others (probably most) have to make sacrifices or at least trade offs (Diablo games inventory looks a lot worse (circular for more thumb stick control) and less satisfying, BUT movement and aim is better with a gamepad).
Most devs make a port with the money from initial release.
If it is successful enough and wants be more successful, it will release on consoles for sure.
0 kommentar(er)
